Tesla shared images of the Model S and Model X’s new high-efficiency drive units in April, which help the vehicles gain more range compared to their previous iterations. Just recently, more details regarding the two models were shared by a Tesla insider to a YouTube channel called Like Tesla.
In the short video, Kim, the channel’s host, outlined a number of details in which the Tesla insider shared about potential improvements coming to the Model S and Model X, such as updates to the flagship vehicles’ motors, batteries, and charging systems.
the Model S and Model X refresh that Tesla reportedly plans to introduce later this year is rumored to potentially feature a tri-motor design. One small motor will be located in the front, while two larger motors will be in the rear, allowing the electric car maker to increase its range. The Model S refresh is said to have an EPA rating north of 400 miles (644 km) per charge, while the Model X is nearing the 400-mile per charge mark.
In addition, the two refreshed flagship vehicles will reportedly be fitted with larger and lighter battery packs, which will provide an increased performance and added range, as well as a new cooling system for the motors and batteries, which is currently being tested under extreme heat conditions in areas such as Death Valley and the Mojave Desert, according to the YouTube channel.
According to the Tesla insider, the upcoming vehicles will be compatible with the Supercharger V3 Network, which should allow the flagship sedan and SUV to charge at 250 kW.
Elon Musk has largely downplayed a potential refresh for the Model S and Model X, suggesting that an upgrade for the two models is not on the cards any time soon. However, as the company rolled out updates to the flagship sedan and SUV last April, perhaps we will see a refreshed Model S and Model X in another surprise reveal.
This is rather hilarious – these ballyhoed improvements are nothing more than a false attemptt o catch up with the competition. The Porsche Taycan and others have a cooling system that is sustainable, while the Model S and Model X do not – they overheat in a short whilw under max output and the power has tobe cut by the compeuter – the Porsche can sustain max output “forever.” And the competiiton drivetrains, such as the I Pace are every bit as efficient as anything Tesla has. And other competitors are talking 400 mile driving ranges – we can assume that those ranges will only be available for the $100,000 plus Tesla Model S and X cars. The three motor models will only be availabkle for the $130,000 plus vehicles. Tesla is making the cheapest improvements it can – bigger battery, more electric motors. Big deal – the cars are not being redesigned. The EV wordl uses the CCS protocol chargers, many made by IONITY and they currenrtly have a max output far greatert han Tesla’s new V3 Superchargers (250KW) . CCS chargers with 450KW output were demoed weeks ago by BMW et al- they are almost twice was fast as Tesla’s chargers and will be located in Shell, Exxon, Mobil, Target, Walmart, etc etc. More than 40,000 will be operating within a few years. The Tesla Supercharger network is stagnant , for lack of cash.
The Jaguar I-Pace is rated for 298 miles (480 km) of range, less than a Tesla Model 3 long-range (310 miles or 500 km). Cost for an entry-level I-Pace is about $69k, while the long-range Model 3 is $50k.
So, I strongly doubt they’re going to beat Tesla’s range, and for less cost.
As for the battery cooling performance and output, Tesla only “overclocks” the power output and cooling system when special racing modes are engaged, for that specific purpose. Otherwise, they are always in a sustainable state. Additionally, a Model S 100D (not the performance variant, so it does not have Ludicrous Mode) has an acceleration time (0-60) of 3.7 seconds, while the I-Pace is 4.8s. Even if it a temporary boost, I’d still rather have a vehicle capable of doing so, and then dropping back to sustainable levels for normal driving, and STILL have better performance than a vehicle that is not capable of doing the same. Oh, and that Model S is $85k, not $100k.
The Jaguar I-Pace is rated for 292 miles (470 km) of range, less than a Tesla Model 3 long-range (310 miles or 499 km). Cost for an entry-level I-Pace is about $69k, while the long-range Model 3 is $50k.
So, I strongly doubt they’re going to beat Tesla’s range, and for less cost.
As for the battery cooling performance and output, Tesla only “overclocks” the power output and cooling system when special racing modes are engaged, for that specific purpose. Otherwise, they are always in a sustainable state. Additionally, a Model S 100D (not the performance variant, so it does not have Ludicrous Mode) has an acceleration time (0-100kph) of 3.7 seconds, while the I-Pace is 4.8s. Even if it is a temporary boost, I’d still rather have a vehicle capable of doing so, and then dropping back to sustainable levels for normal driving, and STILL have better performance (in normal driving) than a vehicle that is not capable of doing the same. Oh, and that Model S is $85k, not $100k.
As for fast charging, none of the I-Pace specs indicate anything about supporting 450kw charging, nor even as high as Tesla’s V3 Supercharging. In fact, even under 100kw charging, the I-Pace’s charging speed is below average, at 45min to reach 80%.
Finally, how many 450kw charging stations are there? Oh right, none yet. How many CCS DC fast-charging stations are there? From a quick glance, I’m seeing about ~260 CCS stations in North America. How many Supercharging stations are there? Over 700 stations in North America…also, Supercharger stations typically have more plugs/station, than CCS charging points. Additionally, Supercharger station construction has been growing steadily, with no signs of slowing down (over 300 new stations built globally in 2018, and over 120 new stations built globally in 2019 so far), so your idea that the Supercharger network has “stalled” is very ill-founded.
Oh, and Supercharging speeds are faster than DC fast-charging, too.
It would seem to me, that most of the “ballyhoo” here is about how supposedly great the I-Pace is. No thanks, I’ll still take a Tesla.
You’re a troll spreading the same anti-Tesla rubbish on several sites.And you’re a dick.
Wow! So much FUD and lies…..